Submerged Transit Navigational Protocol
Since 05-28-05
BULLETIN 40
When Nautilus made her historic transit from the Pacific to the Atlantic via the polar route in the early 1950s she did so submerged and on nuclear power. The world wide acclaim due this first nuclear submarine was predicated on the amazing feat of winding her way through the uncharted and menacing ice that hung like inverted mountains from the surface of the frozen ocean.
To accomplish this the submarine had been equipped with forward, side scanning and up-down sensing sonar transducers. The boat "saw" her way through the ice fields by constant pinging.
Such use of active sonar while transiting oceans today would violate a submarine mission's protocol to remain undetected. A modern boat uses active sonar for soundings in a judicial manner. Thus, a modern submarine relies upon the accuracy of its navigation and the reliability of the bottom information at hand to keep it from harm's way.
The modern submarine has at its disposal a variety of navigational information not known to the crew of the Nautilus. Of course, it still has the traditional methods of dead reckoning and celestial observation to back up its sophisticated electronic information.
During the 1950s a navigator relied upon Loran which was based upon electronic signals emitted from fixed positions around the globe linked to slave stations. The submarine fixed its position by intersecting hyperbolas. It worked fine for its day, but was primitive by today's standards.
Much of a modern
submarine's ability to navigate accurately is a product of the Navy's early
interest in building a submerged launching platform for missiles. In order for
the missile to hit a target it was necessary to know the exact position of the
submarine launching it.
Early attempts at accurate electronic navigation included RAFOS, a gravimetric
system which relied upon gravity deviations and SOFAR which dangled a small
explosive device over a sea's bottom, recorded the explosion's echo and compared
that to known information about bottom topography. Neither OF these methods
proved to be very reliable.
In the 1960s the development of the SSK program necessitated the use of more sophisticated navigational methodology. These sonar picket boats had to remain in a geographical area and to do this they had to know exactly where they were. Navigation became critical and the Navy stepped up its research in this area.
TROUNCE was the
first step toward an inertial navigation system. It required an emission from a
radar equipped periscope to track a guided missile. With the development of the
stabilized periscope for azimuth sights, accurate navigational inputs to an
inertial system of tracking became possible.
SINS may be thought of as a computerized dead reckoning using extremely accurate
inputs including an electromagnetic log, star-tracker periscope with radiometric
sextant and NAVDAC for ground speed measurement. It verifies its information
through ground comparisons.
The SINS system is now an augmentation for satellite navigation which uses fixed satellites and on-board receptors/computers. Indeed, the electronics technician-nav specialist (the old quartermaster rate) often uses a commercial hand-held computer that reads longitude and latitude accurate to the fraction of a minute.
The probability that a submerged submarine knows exactly where it is at all times is extremely high. It need not rely upon any single system, but uses all its inputs from sophisticated electronic and computerized information to simple dead reckoning using a log and compass heading.
It is not enough to know where a submarine is to insure safety of submerged transit. It is essential to know how much water is under the boat's keel. How does a submarine make this determination? The simplest method is to take a sounding, but as stated above this is done sparingly and only then to verify what is shown on charts.
Chart information
comes from several sources including the Coast and Geodetic Survey, the United
States Hydrographic Office or the Naval Oceanographic Office and its
international equivalent. At the outset it should be noted that the modern
submarine has bottom information from computerized electronic displays as well
as paper charts known to all submariners.
Computerized electronic displays are only as accurate as the information stored
in its computer. These displays are most often applicable to harbors, coasts,
channels and other thoroughly explored areas. As the transiting submarine moves
into open water under the high seas it shifts its navigation emphasis to paper
charts. The navigator uses both devices to keep track of where the submarine is
in relation to the depth under the keel.
The reliability of charts and electronic/computerized displays is a function of the organizations that produce the information and the adequacy of the information availability. A cursory inspection of the organizations include:
A United States
submarine carries as many of current charts as may be needed for the intended
transit and operation. Charts may be overlapping in that area charts may be
supplemented by larger scale charts showing more detail of a specific underwater
terrain. Additionally, a submarine navigator insures that it has the latest
information in digital form for use in its electronic/computerized displays.
There is little question that a modern submarine knows exactly where it is at all times. The only limitation on depth-below-the-keel information lies in the reliability of the information in the on-board charts produced by the above organizations.