FCC POISED TO ACT ON BPL REPORT AND ORDER IN MID-OCTOBER 2004
Since 09-25-04
The FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) will
present a draft broadband over power line (BPL) Report and Order to the full
Commission when it meets October 14, the ARRL has learned. More than 6100
comments have been filed on the topic since the FCC released its initial Notice
of Inquiry in the proceeding, ET Docket 03-104, in April 2003 and a subsequent
Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM), ET Docket 04-37, in February of this
year. The ARRL so far on this round has taken its concerns regarding Amateur
Radio and BPL to three of the Commission's five members. In a meeting this week
with FCC Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein, an ARRL delegation again asserted
that the FCC is pushing the proceeding to a predetermined conclusion with little
regard for technical issues.
"Because the FCC has been unwilling to release for public review the results of
its own tests and observations of BPL systems, the ARRL has no confidence that
the draft Report and Order will be based on sound engineering and believes the
rush to adoption is unwarranted and premature," ARRL Chief Executive Officer
David Sumner, K1ZZ, said in a follow-up letter to Adelstein. The letter
reiterated the League's key points that, it said, "represent the minimum
protection" that should be incorporated into the BPL Report and Order prior to
Commission adoption.
"Without adequate safeguards, the deployment of BPL systems will result in the
pollution and degradation of the unique natural resource of the high-frequency
radio spectrum," Sumner said.
The League argued that the R&O include a reduction in the radiated emission
limit. The ARRL wants the limit set 30 dB below current Part 15 requirements,
which, it says, were established with narrowband point-source radiators in mind.
"The record in this proceeding clearly establishes that BPL is not a
point-source radiator," the ARRL's letter asserted.
The ARRL pointed out that the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) has concluded that at the current Part 15 limit,
interference is "likely" to receivers in land vehicles 75 meters from BPL-connected
power lines and to fixed stations 460 meters from such power lines.
"Given the number of amateur stations and the fact that they almost invariably
are located near power lines, the areas of potential interference at the
existing Part 15 limit are clearly too large to permit case-by-case resolution
of interference issues," Sumner said. "Based on experience with the very limited
test deployments of BPL systems to date, notably in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Southern
Wake County, North Carolina, and Cottonwood, Arizona," the ARRL told Adelstein,
"widespread BPL deployment at the existing Part 15 radiated emission limit will
result in an unmanageable incidence of interference."
The only way to reduce these areas of potential interference is to reduce the
radiated emission limit, the ARRL maintained. Mandatory "notching" of the
amateur bands by 30 dB would reduce the probability of interference to amateur
stations sufficiently that the remaining interference cases might be resolved on
a case-by-case basis. "However," the League added, "such notching would not
solve the problem for other radio services."
The ARRL contingent, which included Sumner, ARRL General Counsel Chris Imlay,
W3KD, and ARRL Chief Technology Officer Paul Rinaldo, W4RI, decried the FCC's
lack of response to issues Sumner raised two months ago regarding a North
Carolina Amateur Radio interference complaint. The ARRL representatives carried
copies of correspondence questioning a July OET report that essentially gave the
Progress Energy Corp BPL field trial a clean bill of health despite continued
interference on amateur frequencies.
The League delegation suggested to Adelstein that the OET has swept the North
Carolina BPL interference case under the rug and has attempted to discount
interference issues in general while overstating the FCC's ability o address
them.
Other points the ARRL has stressed in its meetings with Commission members
include:
* consider including the NTIA's recommendations to standardize measurement
procedures and to require that Access BPL systems be certificated, not merely
verified.
* requiring independent confirmation of rules compliance before a BPL system is
placed in operation.
* the need for advance public notification of BPL system locations and
characteristics, something not included in the NPRM
* performance standards for interference mitigation that would require that
interference be terminated immediately upon notification to the operator; and
meaningful penalties for non-compliance, including fines.
* require BPL marketers to "give clear notice to potential customers that
licensed radio services have priority and that the delivery of broadband service
via BPL cannot be guaranteed."
In addition to Adelstein, ARRL representatives have met so far with
Commissioners Kevin J. Martin, and Michael J. Copps. The League hopes to meet
with the principal advisors to Chairman Michael K. Powell and Commissioner
Kathleen Q. Abernathy before the October 7 cutoff for ex parte communications in
the proceeding.
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from
http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm